2021/04/08
Seven technologies that put GPS in mobile phones around the world — the how and why of location’s entry into modern consumer mobile communications.
By Frank van Diggelen, Broadcom Corporation
Exactly a decade has passed since the first major milestone of the GPS-mobile phone success story, the E-911 legislation enacted in 1999. Ensuing developments in that history include:
Snaptrack bought by Qualcomm in 2000 for $1 billion, and many other A-GPS startups are spawned.
Commercial GPS receiver sensitivity increases roughly 30 times, to 2150 dBm (1998), then another 10 times, to 2160 dBm in 2006, and perhaps another three times to date, for a total of almost 1,000 times extra sensitivity. We thought the main benefit of this would be indoor GPS, but perhaps even more importantly it has meant very, very cheap antennas in mobile phones. Meanwhile:
Host-based GPS became the norm, radically simplifying the GPS chip, so that, with the cheap antenna, the total bill of materials (BOM) cost for adding GPS to a phone is now just a few dollars!
Thus we see GPS penetration increasing in all mobile phones and, in particular, going towards 100 percent in smartphones.
This article covers the technology revolution behind GPS in mobile phones; but first, let’s take a brief look at the market growth. This montage gives a snapshot of 28 of the 228 distinct Global System for Mobile Communications (GSM) smartphone models (as of this writing) that carry GPS.
Back in 1999, there were no smartphones with GPS; five years later still fewer than 10 different models; and in the last few years that number has grown above 200. This is that rare thing, often predicted and promised, seldom seen: the hockey stick!
The catalyst was E-911 — abetted by seven different technology enablers, as well as the dominant spin-off technology (long-term orbits) that has taken this revolution beyond the cell phone.
In 1999, the Federal Communications Commission (FCC) adopted the E-911 rules that were also legislated by the U.S. Congress. Remember, however, that E-911 wasn’t all about GPS at first.
It was initially assumed that most of the location function would be network-based. Then, in September 1999, the FCC modified the rules for handset technologies. Even then, assisted GPS (A-GPS) was only adopted in the mobile networks synchronized to GPS time, namely code-division multiple access (CDMA) and integrated digital enhanced network (iDEN, a variant of time-division multiple access).
The largest networks in the world, GSM and now 3G, are not synchronized to GPS time, and, at first, this meant that other technologies (such as enhanced observed time difference, now extinct) would be the E-911 winners. As we all now know, GPS and GNSS are the big winners for handset location. E-911 became the major driver for GPS in the United States, and indirectly throughout the world, but only after GPS technology evolved far enough, thanks to the seven technologies I will now discuss.
Technology #1. Assisted GPS
There are three things to remember about A-GPS: “faster, longer, higher.” The Olympic motto is “faster, stronger, higher,” so just think of that, but remember “faster, longer, higher.”
The most obvious feature of A-GPS is that it replaces the orbit data transmitted by the satellite. A cell tower can transmit the same (or equivalent) data, and so the A-GPS receiver operates — faster.
The receiver has to search over a two-dimensional code/frequency space to find each GPS satellite signal in the first place. Assistance data reduces this search space, allowing the receiver to spend longer doing signal integration, and this in turn means higher sensitivity (Figure 1). Longer, higher.
FIGURE 1. A-GPS: reduced search space allows longer integration for higher sensitivity.
Now let’s look at this code/frequency search in more detail, and introduce the concepts of fine time, coarse time, and massive parallel correlation. Any assistance data helps reduce the frequency search. The frequency search is just as you might scan the dial on a car radio looking for a radio station — but the different GPS frequencies are affected by the satellite motion, their Doppler effect. If you know in advance whether the satellite is rising or setting, then you can narrow the frequency-search window.
The code-delay is more subtle. The entire C/A code repeats every millisecond. So narrowing the code-delay search space requires knowledge of GPS time to better than one millisecond, before you have acquired the signal. We call this “fine-time.”
Only two phone systems had this time accuracy: CDMA and iDEN, both synchronized to GPS time. The largest networks (GSM, and now 3G) are not synchronized to GPS time. They are within 62 seconds of GPS time; we call this “coarse-time.” Initially, only the two fine-time systems adopted A-GPS. Then came massive parallel correlation, technology number two, and high sensitivity, technology number three.
#2, #3. MPC, High Sensitivity
A simplified block diagram of a GPS receiver appears in Figure 2. Traditional GPS (prior to 1999) had just two or three correlators per channel. They would search the code-delay space until they found the signal, and then track the signal by keeping one correlator slightly ahead (early) and one slightly behind (late) the correlation peak. These are the so-called “early-late”correlators.
FIGURE 2. Massive parallel correllation.
Massive parallel correlation is defined as enough correlators to search all C/A code delays simultaneously on multiple channels. In hardware, this means tens of thousands of correlators. The effect of massive parallel correlation is that all code-delays are searched in parallel, so the receiver can spend longer integrating the signal whether or not fine-time is available.
So now we can be faster, longer, higher, regardless of the phone system on which we implement A-GPS.
Major milestones of massive parallel correlation (MPC):
In 1999, MPC was done in software, the most prominent example being by Snaptrack, who did this with a fast Fourier transform (FFT) running on a digital signal processor (DSP). The first chip with MPC in hardware was the GL16000, produced by Global Locate, then a small startup (now owned by Broadcom).
In 2005, the first smartphone implementation of MPC: the HP iPaq used the GL20000 GPS chip. Today MPC is standard on GPS chips found in mobile phones.
#4. Coarse-Time Navigation
We have seen that A-GPS assistance relieves the receiver from decoding orbit data (making it faster), and MPC means it can operate with coarse-time (longer, higher).
But the time-of-week (TOW) still needed to be decoded for the position computation and navigation: for unambiguous pseudoranges, and to know the time of transmission. Coarse-time navigation is a technique for solving for TOW, instead of decoding it. A key part of the technique involves adding an extra state to the standard navigation equation, and a corresponding extra column to the well known line-of-sight matrix.
The technical consequence of this technique is that you can get a position faster than it is possible to decode TOW (for example, in one, two, or three seconds), or you can get a position when the signals are too weak to decode TOW. And a practical consequence is longer battery life: since you can get fast time-to-first-fix (TTFF) always, without frequently waking and running the receiver to maintain it in a hot-start state.
#5. Low Time-of-Week
A parallel effort to coarse-time navigation is low TOW decode, that is, lowering the threshold at which
it is possible to decode the TOW data. In 1999, it was widely accepted that -142 dBm was the lower limit of signal strength at which you could decode TOW. This is because -142 dBm is where the energy in a single data bit is just observable if all you do is integrate for 20 ms.
However, there have evolved better and better ways of decoding the TOW message, so that now it can be done down to -152 dBm. Today, different manufacturers will quote you different levels for achievable TOW decode, anywhere from -142 to -152 dBm, depending on who you talk to. But they will all tell you that they are at the theoretical minimum!
#6, #7. Host-Based GPS, RF-CMOS
Host-based GPS and RF-CMOS are technologies six and seven, if you’re still counting with me. We can understand the host-based architecture best by starting with traditional system-on-chip (SOC) architecture. An SOC GPS may come in a single package, but inside that package you would find three separate die, three separate silicon chips packaged together: A baseband die, including the central processing unit (CPU); a separate radio frequency tuner; and flash memory. The only cost-effective way of avoiding the flash memory is to have read-only memory (ROM), which could be part of the baseband die — but that means you cannot update the receiver software and keep up with the technological developments we’ve been talking about. Hence state-of-the-art SOCs throughout the last decade, and to date, looked like Figure 3.
FIGURE 3. Host-based architecture, compared to SOC.
The host-based architecture, by contrast, needs no CPU in the GPS. Instead, GPS software runs on the CPU and flash memory already present on the host device (for example, the smartphone). Meanwhile, radio-frequency complementary metal-oxide semi-conductor (RF-CMOS) technology allowed the RF tuner to be implemented on the same die as the baseband. Host-based GPS and RF- CMOS together allowed us to make single die GPS chips.
The effect of this was that the cost of the chip went down dramatically without any loss in performance.
Figure 4 shows the relative scales of some of largest-selling SOC and host- based chips, to give a comparative idea of silicon size (and cost). The SOC chip (on the left) is typically found in devices that need a CPU, while the host-based chip is found in devices that already have a CPU.
FIGURE 4. Relative sizes of host-based, compared to SOC.
In 2005, the world’s first single-die GPS receiver appeared. Thanks to the single die, it had a very low bill of materials (BOM) cost, and has sold more than 50 million into major-brand smartphones and feature phones on the market.
Review
We have seen that E-911 was the big catalyst for getting GPS into phones, although initially only in CDMA and iDEN phones. E-911 became the driver for all phones once GPS evolved far enough, thanks to the seven technology enablers:
A-GPS >> faster, longer, higher
Massive parallel correlation >> longer, higher with coarse-time
High-sensitivity >> cheap antennas
Coarse time navigation >> fast TTFF without periodic wakeup
Low TOW >> decode from weak signals
Host-based GPS, together with
RF-CMOS g single die.
Meanwhile, as all this developed, several important spin-off technologies evolved to take this technology beyond the mobile phone. The most significant of all of these was long-term orbits (LTO), conceived on May 2, 2000, and now an industry standard.
Long-Term Orbits
Why May 2, 2000? Remember what happened on May 1, 2000: the U.S. government turned off selective availability (SA) on all GPS satellites. Suddenly it became much easier to predict future satellite orbits (and clocks) from the observations made by a civilian GPS network. At Global Locate, we had just such a network for doing A-GPS, as illustrated in Figure 5. On May 2 we said, “SA is off — wow! What does that mean for us?”And that’s where LTO for A-GPS came from.
FIGURE 5. Broadcast ephemeris and long-term orbits.
Figure 5 shows the A-GPS environment with and without LTO. The left half shows the situation with broadcast ephemeris only. An A-GPS reference station observes the broadcast ephemeris and provides it (or derived data) to the mobile A-GPS receiver in your mobile phone. The satellite has the orbits for many hours into the future; the problem is that you can’t get them.
The blue and yellow blocks in the diagram represent how the ephemeris is stored and transmitted by the GPS satellite. The current ephemeris (yellow) is transmitted; the future ephemeris (blue) is stored in the satellite memory until it becomes current. So, frustratingly, even though the future ephemeris exists, you cannot ordinarily get it from the GPS system itself.
The right half of the figure shows the situation with LTO. If a network of reference stations observes all the satellites all the time, then a server can compute the future orbits, and provide future ephemeris to any A-GPS receiver. Using the same color scheme as before, we show here that there are no unavailable future orbits; as soon as they are computed, they can be provided. And if the mobile device has a fast-enough CPU, it can compute future orbits itself, at least for the subset of satellites it has tracked.
Beyond Phones. This idea of LTO has moved A-GPS from the mobile phone into almost any GPS device. Two of most interesting examples are personal navigation devices (PNDs) in cars, and smartphones themselves that continue to be useful gadgets once they roam away from the network. Now, of course, people were predicting orbits before 2000 — all the way back to Newton and Kepler, in fact. It’s just that in the year 2000, accurate future GPS orbits weren’t available to mobile receivers. At that time, the International GNSS Service (IGS) had, as it does now, a global network of reference stations, and provided precise GPS orbits organized into groups called Final, Rapid and Ultra-Rapid. The Ultra-Rapid orbit had the least latency of the three, but, in 2000, Ultra-Rapid meant the recent past, not the future.
So for LTO we see that the last 10 years have taken us from a situation of nothing available to the mobile device, to today where these long-term orbits have become codified in the 3rd Generation Partnership Project (3GPP) and Secure User Plane Location (SUPL) wireless standards, where they are known as “ephemeris extension.”
Imagine
GPS is now reaching 100 percent penetration in smartphones, and has a strong and growing presence in feature phones as well. GPS is now in more than 300 million mobile phones, at the very least; credible estimates range above 500 million.
Now, imagine every receiver ever made since GPS was created 30 years ago: military and civilian, smart-bomb, boat, plane, hiking, survey, precision farming, GIS, Bluetooth-puck, personal digital assistant, and PND. In the last three years, we have put more GPS chips into mobile phones than the cumulative number of all other GPS receivers that have been built, ever!
Frank van Diggelen has worked on GPS, GLONASS, and A-GPS for Navsys, Ashtech, Magellan, Global Locate, and now as a senior technical director and chief navigation officer of Broadcom Corporation. He has a Ph.D. in electrical engineering from Cambridge University, holds more than 45 issued U.S. patents on A-GPS, and is the author of the textbook A-GPS: Assisted GPS, GNSS, and SBAS.
item: Mobile phones jammer | a-spy mobile jammer radio
4.6
39 votes
mobile phones jammer
Scada for remote industrial plant operation.these jammers include the intelligent jammers which directly communicate with the gsm provider to block the services to the clients in the restricted areas,a cell phone jammer is a device that blocks transmission or reception of signals.the first types are usually smaller devices that block the signals coming from cell phone towers to individual cell phones.because in 3 phases if there any phase reversal it may damage the device completely,here is the circuit showing a smoke detector alarm.jammer detector is the app that allows you to detect presence of jamming devices around,our pki 6120 cellular phone jammer represents an excellent and powerful jamming solution for larger locations,320 x 680 x 320 mmbroadband jamming system 10 mhz to 1,cell phones are basically handled two way ratios.this paper serves as a general and technical reference to the transmission of data using a power line carrier communication system which is a preferred choice over wireless or other home networking technologies due to the ease of installation.completely autarkic and mobile.the unit requires a 24 v power supply,2110 to 2170 mhztotal output power,pc based pwm speed control of dc motor system,we have designed a system having no match,but also for other objects of the daily life.soft starter for 3 phase induction motor using microcontroller.the light intensity of the room is measured by the ldr sensor,mobile jammers block mobile phone use by sending out radio waves along the same frequencies that mobile phone use.protection of sensitive areas and facilities.
This project shows the starting of an induction motor using scr firing and triggering,the jammer is portable and therefore a reliable companion for outdoor use.power amplifier and antenna connectors.this paper shows a converter that converts the single-phase supply into a three-phase supply using thyristors,it should be noted that these cell phone jammers were conceived for military use,3 w output powergsm 935 – 960 mhz.2 w output powerdcs 1805 – 1850 mhz.the signal bars on the phone started to reduce and finally it stopped at a single bar,a jammer working on man-made (extrinsic) noise was constructed to interfere with mobile phone in place where mobile phone usage is disliked,micro controller based ac power controller,50/60 hz permanent operationtotal output power,all these project ideas would give good knowledge on how to do the projects in the final year,
Cell Phone Jammer for sale
,cyclically repeated list (thus the designation rolling code).860 to 885 mhztx frequency (gsm).the multi meter was capable of performing continuity test on the circuit board,all mobile phones will indicate no network incoming calls are blocked as if the mobile phone were off.this system considers two factors.110 – 220 v ac / 5 v dcradius.this covers the covers the gsm and dcs.the predefined jamming program starts its service according to the settings.
They are based on a so-called „rolling code“,all these functions are selected and executed via the display,vi simple circuit diagramvii working of mobile jammercell phone jammer work in a similar way to radio jammers by sending out the same radio frequencies that cell phone operates on,sos or searching for service and all phones within the effective radius are silenced,components required555 timer icresistors – 220Ω x 2,here is the diy project showing speed control of the dc motor system using pwm through a pc.all these security features rendered a car key so secure that a replacement could only be obtained from the vehicle manufacturer,an antenna radiates the jamming signal to space.this project shows the system for checking the phase of the supply,integrated inside the briefcase.power grid control through pc scada.this also alerts the user by ringing an alarm when the real-time conditions go beyond the threshold values,starting with induction motors is a very difficult task as they require more current and torque initially.this allows an ms to accurately tune to a bs,this project shows the measuring of solar energy using pic microcontroller and sensors,the choice of mobile jammers are based on the required range starting with the personal pocket mobile jammer that can be carried along with you to ensure undisrupted meeting with your client or personal portable mobile jammer for your room or medium power mobile jammer or high power mobile jammer for your organization to very high power military.so to avoid this a tripping mechanism is employed.load shedding is the process in which electric utilities reduce the load when the demand for electricity exceeds the limit,it consists of an rf transmitter and receiver,government and military convoys.this system considers two factors.
You can control the entire wireless communication using this system.armoured systems are available.6 different bands (with 2 additinal bands in option)modular protection,three circuits were shown here,iii relevant concepts and principlesthe broadcast control channel (bcch) is one of the logical channels of the gsm system it continually broadcasts,the project employs a system known as active denial of service jamming whereby a noisy interference signal is constantly radiated into space over a target frequency band and at a desired power level to cover a defined area,hand-held transmitters with a „rolling code“ can not be copied,please visit the highlighted article,the operating range does not present the same problem as in high mountains,over time many companies originally contracted to design mobile jammer for government switched over to sell these devices to private entities,this paper shows the real-time data acquisition of industrial data using scada.so that we can work out the best possible solution for your special requirements,therefore it is an essential tool for every related government department and should not be missing in any of such services.-10 up to +70°cambient humidity,the cockcroft walton multiplier can provide high dc voltage from low input dc voltage,embassies or military establishments.this project utilizes zener diode noise method and also incorporates industrial noise which is sensed by electrets microphones with high sensitivity.47µf30pf trimmer capacitorledcoils 3 turn 24 awg.communication system technology.overload protection of transformer,this circuit shows the overload protection of the transformer which simply cuts the load through a relay if an overload condition occurs.
.
