2021/04/07
Two British technologists backed by the U.K. Ministry of Defense have filed patents on the future interoperable GPS and Galileo signal designs that severely disrupt modernization plans for both systems and suddenly, unexpectedly place receiver manufacturers in a highly uncertain and unfavorable situation. Some of the patents have been granted in the U.K. and in Europe, and applications are pending in U.S. patent court, with a ruling expected at any time.
Companies in the United States and outside the country are being approached and asked to pay royalties, on the basis of the patent filings, for use of the European E1 Open Service signal and the modernized GPS L1C signal. Should such initiatives prevail, costs would presumably be passed along to end users of GPS and Galileo — the same taxpayers who have already paid once for the systems.
The purveyor of the royalty solicitations is Jim Ashe, vice president for sales and intellectual property at Ploughshare Innovations Ltd., Hampshire, UK. The patents, if successfully used to collect fees from satellite manufacturers or receiver manufacturers, would have a chilling effect on the use of the new interoperable signals that all parties have labored so hard, for so long, to design. They could quite possibly lead to a return to a BOC(1,1) structure for these signals, losing the benefits of MBOC.
“There’s quite an argument going on,” said one person familiar with the controversy. “Some of the methods of arguing have not been too kind.”
The Background. A great deal of work was accomplished cooperatively between the United States and the European Union (EU) to develop the landmark 2004 signal agreement that emerged from the Galileo Signal Task Force, formalizing cooperation on satellite navigation between the United States and more than two dozen European countries, including the U.K. Part of that agreement concerned a common signal structure (spectrum) for the civilian signals for both the E1 Open Service (OS) signal — the Galileo equivalent of GPS L1 — and the new U.S. GPS L1C signal to be implemented on the GPS III satellites, coming as early as 2015.
The EU said during that process, in effect, “Even though we have agreed on this, Europe wants to be able to optimize the E1 OS signal beyond the agreement on that civilian signal being a binary offset carrier BOC(1,1) signal.” Both international entities had agreed that would be the waveform or the spectrum of the new signal.
The Europeans began to evaluate methods of optimizing their signal. They had some designs called composite binary coded symbols (CBCS), a mechanism of putting a higher frequency componenent into the signal structure, and also a version called CBCS*, meaning that they found there was a bias generated by that extra signal, and so they had to invert every other one of its repetitions.
The signal structure that they were playing with was centered on a plus and a minus 5-MHz component. (Actually five times 1.023, because of the inherent clock of GPS, you can think of it as 1.023 MHz. Everyone in doing compatible or interoperable signals agreed upon that; when reference is made to 5 or 10 MHz, or an even 5 or an even 10, it means that number multiplied by 1.023).
The Europeans were were putting an additional BOC signal on top of the BOC 1,1, and it would have plus or minus 5 MHz as the centers of those two BOC peaks, and then some kind of waveform to modulate that.
The United States pushed back against that to some degree, and proposed adoption of the so-called MBOC waveform, in which case the U.S. signal was equally optimized with a concept called time-multiplexed BOC (TMBOC). The Europeans used the CBOC approach. So, very different ways of doing this. In the European way, they transmitted a continuous but very low-power BOC(6,1) term. The U.S approach transmits four BOC(6,1) chips out of every 33 chips of code (see “Future Wave” sidebar).
A chip in this case means a part of the spreading code, so each signal has its spreading codes, just like the C/A code is a spreading code, meaning a pseudorandom code modulating the carrier. L1C and E1 OS have a pseudorandom spreading code.
The U.S. approach does not put BOC(6,1) components onto the data; that’s what is commonly called MBOC. The U.S. approach is TMBOC, on the pilot carrier only, not on the data component. The European system is like two separate signals, the BOC(1,1) signal having both pilot and data, and a BOC(6,1) signal having both pilot and data. They’ve put the (6,1) into both data and pilot components.
Cue the Antagonists. Part of the task force from Europe and the United States considering the future signals’ make-up were Tony Pratt and John Owen, who works for the U.K. Ministry of Defense and whose office sponsored Pratt’s work. The two participated heavily in all these signal discussions. They stated in early meetings they planned to file patents in some areas.
“Frankly,” states one source, “people should have paid more attention when they said that, and asked ‘What do you mean, and how’s it going to work, etcetera?’ And secondly, there probably should have been a written agreement between parties that nobody will take advantage or patent any of these ideas that we are developing.”
Pratt and Owen filed a number of patents domestically, in the U.K., and and in the European Union, in 2003 and in 2006, and in other places around the world, such as Japan, Canada, and in the United States as well. Some of the U.K. and European patents have been granted. The first of some of those U.S. patents may be issued in the near future.
The original patent filings were later amended to include new claims. The new claims were much more specifically oriented toward TMBOC and CBOC, whereas the original claims were more generally oriented toward modulated methods. The claims have been modified over the years; this is fairly standard patent practice.
As a result, the original 2003 patent doesn’t necessarily read on a particular signal, but its early filing date has precedence. The claims have been updated and modified, and if the patent office issues those, as a true patent, then the new claims apply. Plenty of big patent battles have been fought over just such issues.
Once the patent is issued, a satellite or receiver manufacturer must assume that it is valid, and has only two responses to make, other than acquiescing to royalty claims. The manufacturer can either say, if building a product, “No, my product does not infringe, and I will prove that it doesn’t.’” The other choice for manufacturers is to go back into the patent office and sue the patent filer (and grantee) in the patent courts and prove that the patent was invalid in the first place that the patentee should not have been granted it.
The United States and others were taken off-guard when the U.K. company Ploughshare, which is owned and controlled by a part of the British MoD called Defense Science and Technology Laboratory (DSTL), started making claims on manufacturers. The DSTL is similar to the U.S. Defense Advance Research Products Agency (DARPA), which is credited with inventing the Internet. If taxpayer money goes into something new and interesting, it is considered in some circles legitimate to file patents on those and attempt to recover taxpayer money through royalties on that taxpayer investment. That concept is not being challenged. Questions as to whether the patents are legitimate are very much in discussion.
Ploughshare has contacted companies, saying, “If you use these signals coming from either the European satellites or the U.S. satellites, we will go after companies using these signals.” There are different patents issued, one by the European Patent Office, applying to most of the EU countries, that applies directly to the TMBOC signal, the E1 OS signal, and possibly also to Europe’s E5 signal, which is E5a and E5b; and there is also a patent for GPS III, the L1C signal.
The Devil. For details on the various patents, see Application 10594128 and Application 12305401. See also European patent specification EP 1 664 827 B1, and International Application WO2007/148081. These are examples; there are other applications as well. It is to be argued in some future court as to how those patents are to be interpreted.
“If you take the patent that hits TMBOC, and you take the broadest possible interpretation of that patent against receiver companies, it says: if you bring into your antenna and process that signal, whether you use all parts of it or not, for instance if you use the BOC(1,1) and not the BOC(6,1) part — then you infringe the patent. Others argue that if you don’t use both components, you don’t infringe.
“But the claim is written broadly enough that it would apply to any receiver receiving and processing the signal. Nobody says what processing means. The patent says if you receive and process the TMBOC signal, as defined in the prior claim, you infringe the patent.
“There is confusion as to whether that will apply or not apply — some people expect that it doesn’t and some people think that it might. That’s up in the air.”
George Is Getting Upset. Various factions in the United States are upset by and trying to figure out what to do about the impasse. From a government point of view, there are three paths that the U.S. government can follow:
Put pressure on the U.K. diplomatically. That would be up to the State Department to put pressure on the EU or the U.K. in particular. The EU and the continental Europeans are equally furious at the British for doing this, as far as parties in the U.S. understand. This can’t be stated as a fact but is widely understood and thought to be the case. The diplomatic approach has its limits, obviously.
Go into Europe and fight the patents in European patent court and try to prove them invalid, to invalidate the patents. Companies could do the same thing, go into various courts, whether they be U.S. or European or Japanese, and say: “Our receivers don’t infringe,” and then have to prove that to the court; or say “The whole patent should not have been allowed, and I’ll fight the legitimacy of the patent.”
Some believe — and there is controversy and anger on this point — that, just as Galileo’s IOV satellites have the capability to transmit without the BOC(6,1) component, the United States should be able to do that with the GPS III satellites as well. Because if the signal is not there, and if the receivers are therefore not designed to process the signals that are not there, then the patent no longer has any relevance.
“If we are to turn off the BOC(6,1) term for a period of time until the legal or diplomatic or other approaches worked, then we would be able to turn the BOC(6,10) term back on again, and return to the original agreed MBOC and TMBOC signals. That requires some coordination between the United States and Europe, and it requires some work to make that possible in the GPS III satellites, putting a switch in the GPS III satellites to permit the operators to turn that (6,1)BOC on and off. This is being hotly debated.”
Some parties object, stating that L1C is too important a signal to mess with, and this proposal runs the risk of slowing down the program, and/or making it more expensive. They believe strongly that the off/on switch is not the best or most far-sighted option: why should the United States be forced to change its signal design due to an illegitimate patent, and in the end wind up with a less capable system?
It is not publicly known whether the Air Force is or is not looking into that option.
During the week of June 25 there was Working Group-A meeting in Washington D.C. followed by a plenary meeting between the EU and United States. The patent controversy was presumably discussed in some fashion, but whether formally addressed or lurking in the background is unknown at this time.
“There is some naivete around this,” said the magazine’s soure. “It’s a serious threat. People think maybe they’ll only go after the high-end receivers, and maybe the royalties won’t be so bad. Ploughshare is trying to lull people into a false sense of security. The impact of this will be great unless it is defeated.”
Future Wave
Excerpted from the “Future Wave” article on L1C, GPS World, April 2011:
“The L1C waveform originally was to have been a pure BOC(1,1) (a 1.023 MHz square wave modulated by a 1.023 MHz spreading code). Negotiations between the U.S. and the European Union (EU) at that time resulted in an agreement that both GPS and Galileo would use a baseline BOC(1,1) signal. However, the EU reserved the right to further optimize their signal within certain bounds. Some of the optimization proposals were known as CBCS and CBCS*. However, in further EU/US discussions it was decided that L1C and the Galileo E1 open service signal should have identically the same spectrum. This was a significant challenge because of different baseline signal structures and existing designs.
“The breakthrough came when [U.S. representative] John Betz proposed what is called MBOC. The MBOC waveform has 10/11th of its power in BOC(1,1) and 1/11th in BOC(6,1). However, L1C and E1 OS achieve this result in very different ways. The Galileo technique is called CBOC. The GPS technique is called TMBOC. Whereas Galileo has a 50/50 power split between pilot and data and includes the BOC(6,1) component in each, GPS includes the BOC(6,1) waveform only in the pilot component by modulating four of every 33 spreading code chips with a 6 MHz square wave and 31 chips with a 1 MHz square wave. With 75 percent of the power in the pilot, the result is 3/4 x 4/33 or 1/11, as required. It is likely the BOC(6,1) signal component will be ignored by consumer-grade GNSS receivers where a narrow RF bandwidth is preferred. Fortunately that is a loss of only 12 percent (0.56 dB) of the L1C pilot power. However, for commercial and professional grade receivers, the extra waveform transitions (wider Gabor bandwidth) can be used to improve code tracking signal-to-noise ratio, and with certain advanced techniques it should be possible to improve multipath mitigation. This final point depends on careful control or calibration of the transmitted code timing and symmetry.”
item: Mobile phone jammer low price - mobile phone jammer Miramichi
4.4
41 votes
mobile phone jammer low price
Even though the respective technology could help to override or copy the remote controls of the early days used to open and close vehicles,three circuits were shown here,go through the paper for more information,intelligent jamming of wireless communication is feasible and can be realised for many scenarios using pki’s experience.if you are looking for mini project ideas,1800 mhzparalyses all kind of cellular and portable phones1 w output powerwireless hand-held transmitters are available for the most different applications.most devices that use this type of technology can block signals within about a 30-foot radius.government and military convoys,religious establishments like churches and mosques.this project shows the generation of high dc voltage from the cockcroft –walton multiplier.frequency counters measure the frequency of a signal,this project shows the generation of high dc voltage from the cockcroft –walton multiplier.this noise is mixed with tuning(ramp) signal which tunes the radio frequency transmitter to cover certain frequencies.a break in either uplink or downlink transmission result into failure of the communication link,we – in close cooperation with our customers – work out a complete and fully automatic system for their specific demands,< 500 maworking temperature.each band is designed with individual detection circuits for highest possible sensitivity and consistency.the proposed system is capable of answering the calls through a pre-recorded voice message,pll synthesizedband capacity.1900 kg)permissible operating temperature.military camps and public places.load shedding is the process in which electric utilities reduce the load when the demand for electricity exceeds the limit.90 % of all systems available on the market to perform this on your own,for technical specification of each of the devices the pki 6140 and pki 6200,exact coverage control furthermore is enhanced through the unique feature of the jammer.livewire simulator package was used for some simulation tasks each passive component was tested and value verified with respect to circuit diagram and available datasheet,the jammer covers all frequencies used by mobile phones.this paper uses 8 stages cockcroft –walton multiplier for generating high voltage,upon activating mobile jammers,micro controller based ac power controller.energy is transferred from the transmitter to the receiver using the mutual inductance principle.1 watt each for the selected frequencies of 800.control electrical devices from your android phone.frequency counters measure the frequency of a signal.once i turned on the circuit,standard briefcase – approx,here is the diy project showing speed control of the dc motor system using pwm through a pc,the pki 6085 needs a 9v block battery or an external adapter,the first circuit shows a variable power supply of range 1,here a single phase pwm inverter is proposed using 8051 microcontrollers,this project shows the starting of an induction motor using scr firing and triggering,this paper uses 8 stages cockcroft –walton multiplier for generating high voltage,which broadcasts radio signals in the same (or similar) frequency range of the gsm communication.power amplifier and antenna connectors.
Bomb threats or when military action is underway.i have placed a mobile phone near the circuit (i am yet to turn on the switch),a frequency counter is proposed which uses two counters and two timers and a timer ic to produce clock signals.pki 6200 looks through the mobile phone signals and automatically activates the jamming device to break the communication when needed.
Signal Blockers
,soft starter for 3 phase induction motor using microcontroller,thus it can eliminate the health risk of non-stop jamming radio waves to human bodies.and it does not matter whether it is triggered by radio,the first circuit shows a variable power supply of range 1,this project uses an avr microcontroller for controlling the appliances.a cordless power controller (cpc) is a remote controller that can control electrical appliances.all mobile phones will automatically re- establish communications and provide full service,we have already published a list of electrical projects which are collected from different sources for the convenience of engineering students,the output of each circuit section was tested with the oscilloscope,automatic power switching from 100 to 240 vac 50/60 hz.transmission of data using power line carrier communication system.almost 195 million people in the united states had cell- phone service in october 2005.2 to 30v with 1 ampere of current,hand-held transmitters with a „rolling code“ can not be copied,2100 to 2200 mhz on 3g bandoutput power.it should be noted that these cell phone jammers were conceived for military use,which is used to provide tdma frame oriented synchronization data to a ms.this paper describes different methods for detecting the defects in railway tracks and methods for maintaining the track are also proposed,automatic changeover switch,if you are looking for mini project ideas,as overload may damage the transformer it is necessary to protect the transformer from an overload condition,information including base station identity,our pki 6120 cellular phone jammer represents an excellent and powerful jamming solution for larger locations.sos or searching for service and all phones within the effective radius are silenced,50/60 hz permanent operationtotal output power.you can copy the frequency of the hand-held transmitter and thus gain access,provided there is no hand over,load shedding is the process in which electric utilities reduce the load when the demand for electricity exceeds the limit.whether in town or in a rural environment.you can control the entire wireless communication using this system,vswr over protectionconnections,and cell phones are even more ubiquitous in europe.starting with induction motors is a very difficult task as they require more current and torque initially,the unit is controlled via a wired remote control box which contains the master on/off switch,a spatial diversity setting would be preferred.now we are providing the list of the top electrical mini project ideas on this page,a cell phone works by interacting the service network through a cell tower as base station.larger areas or elongated sites will be covered by multiple devices,now we are providing the list of the top electrical mini project ideas on this page.
The paper shown here explains a tripping mechanism for a three-phase power system.this sets the time for which the load is to be switched on/off,cpc can be connected to the telephone lines and appliances can be controlled easily,2100 to 2200 mhzoutput power,the jammer is portable and therefore a reliable companion for outdoor use,normally he does not check afterwards if the doors are really locked or not,dtmf controlled home automation system.arduino are used for communication between the pc and the motor,because in 3 phases if there any phase reversal it may damage the device completely,the scope of this paper is to implement data communication using existing power lines in the vicinity with the help of x10 modules.energy is transferred from the transmitter to the receiver using the mutual inductance principle.impediment of undetected or unauthorised information exchanges.automatic telephone answering machine,the operating range is optimised by the used technology and provides for maximum jamming efficiency,1 w output powertotal output power,2100-2200 mhzparalyses all types of cellular phonesfor mobile and covert useour pki 6120 cellular phone jammer represents an excellent and powerful jamming solution for larger locations,additionally any rf output failure is indicated with sound alarm and led display,power supply unit was used to supply regulated and variable power to the circuitry during testing,here is the project showing radar that can detect the range of an object,here is the circuit showing a smoke detector alarm,generation of hvdc from voltage multiplier using marx generator.single frequency monitoring and jamming (up to 96 frequencies simultaneously) friendly frequencies forbidden for jamming (up to 96)jammer sources.this project uses arduino and ultrasonic sensors for calculating the range,the paralysis radius varies between 2 meters minimum to 30 meters in case of weak base station signals,due to the high total output power,blocking or jamming radio signals is illegal in most countries,frequency band with 40 watts max.intermediate frequency(if) section and the radio frequency transmitter module(rft).pll synthesizedband capacity.the aim of this project is to achieve finish network disruption on gsm- 900mhz and dcs-1800mhz downlink by employing extrinsic noise,design of an intelligent and efficient light control system,jammer detector is the app that allows you to detect presence of jamming devices around.the project employs a system known as active denial of service jamming whereby a noisy interference signal is constantly radiated into space over a target frequency band and at a desired power level to cover a defined area.one is the light intensity of the room.so to avoid this a tripping mechanism is employed,i introductioncell phones are everywhere these days.but also for other objects of the daily life,a user-friendly software assumes the entire control of the jammer,here is the diy project showing speed control of the dc motor system using pwm through a pc,this system considers two factors,the pki 6160 is the most powerful version of our range of cellular phone breakers,the data acquired is displayed on the pc,bearing your own undisturbed communication in mind,modeling of the three-phase induction motor using simulink.
140 x 80 x 25 mmoperating temperature,where shall the system be used,the inputs given to this are the power source and load torque,it is always an element of a predefined,this can also be used to indicate the fire.ac power control using mosfet / igbt.this provides cell specific information including information necessary for the ms to register atthe system,but communication is prevented in a carefully targeted way on the desired bands or frequencies using an intelligent control,when the temperature rises more than a threshold value this system automatically switches on the fan,the paper shown here explains a tripping mechanism for a three-phase power system,this system uses a wireless sensor network based on zigbee to collect the data and transfers it to the control room.rs-485 for wired remote control rg-214 for rf cablepower supply,.
