2021/04/09
Signal Characteristics of Civil GPS Jammers
By Ryan H. Mitch, Ryan C. Dougherty, Mark L. Psiaki, Steven P. Powell, Brady W. O’Hanlon, Jahshan A. Bhatti, and Todd E. Humphreys
GPS jamming is a continuing threat. A detailed understanding of how the available jammers work is necessary to judge their effectiveness and limitations. A team of researchers from Cornell University and the University of Texas at Austin reports on their analyses of the signal properties of 18 commercially available GPS jammers.
INNOVATION INSIGHTS by Richard Langley
GPS IS AT WAR. It is a major asset for United States and allied military forces in a number of operating theaters around the world in both declared and undeclared conflicts. But GPS is at war on the domestic front, too — at war against a proliferation of jamming equipment being marketed to cause deliberate interference to GPS signals to prevent GPS receivers from computing positions to be locally stored or relayed via tracking networks.
There have been many notable examples of deliberate jamming of GPS receivers. Many more likely go undetected each day. In 2009, outages of a Federal Aviation Administration reference receiver at Newark Liberty International Airport close to the New Jersey Turnpike were traced to a $33, 200 milliwatt GPS jammer in a truck that passed the airport each day. The driver was reportedly arrested and charged. In July 2010, two truck thieves in Britain were jailed for 16 years. They used GPS jammers to prevent the trucks from being tracked after the thefts. And in Germany, some truck drivers have been using jammers to evade the country’s GPS-based road-toll system.
The U.S. and some foreign governments have enacted laws to prohibit the importation, marketing, sale or operation of these so-called personal privacy devices. Nevertheless, a certain number of jammers are in the hands of individuals around the world and they continue to be available from manufacturers and suppliers in certain countries. So, GPS jamming is a continuing threat both at home and abroad and a detailed understanding of how the available jammers work is necessary to judge their effectiveness and limitations. This information will also help in developing countermeasures that could be incorporated into GPS receivers to limit the impact of jammers.
Jammers constitute an enemy force, and as the Chinese General Sun Tzu stated in the Art of War more than 2,000 years ago, battles will be won by knowing your enemy. In the last verse of Chapter Three, he states:
So it is said that if you know your enemies and know yourself, you can win a hundred battles without a single loss.
If you only know yourself, but not your opponent, you may win or may lose.
If you know neither yourself nor your enemy, you will always endanger yourself.
In this month’s column, a team of researchers from Cornell University and the University of Texas at Austin reports on their analyses of the signal properties of 18 commercially available GPS jammers. The enemy has been exposed.
The Global Positioning System has become increasingly incorporated into civilian infrastructure. The increase in GPS-integrated systems has caused a proportional increase in the vulnerability of these systems to jamming and interference. The interests of individuals or groups willing to break the law may be served by interfering with the normal operation of GPS-enabled systems. As a result, in recent years many GPS jamming devices have become available for purchase over the Internet. These relatively cheap devices, some costing less than an inexpensive GPS receiver, pose a significant risk to the normal operation of many systems reliant on GPS.
Many types of intentional radio frequency (RF) interference exist, including tones, swept waveforms, pulses, narrowband noise, and broadband noise. There are a number of methods for mitigating the effects of jamming and interference, and additional methods exist to locate the sources of the interference. Mitigation and location methods can be improved by use of a priori information about the interference source. This article provides such a priori information for a set of jammers and assesses their threats. Its results are based on two tests. The first test records raw RF data from a selection of jammers and analyzes it using fast Fourier transform (FFT) spectral methods. The second test evaluates the effective range of a subset of the GPS jammers using a commercial off-the-shelf (COTS) receiver.
The article presents results based on 18 civil GPS jammers. There are other types of GPS jammers for sale that were not tested. Furthermore, civil jammer behavior and design is likely to evolve over time. In this article, we draw conclusions based on only the jammers that we tested.
Overview of Civil GPS Jammers
Devices that claim to jam or “block” GPS signals are widely available through a number of websites and online entities. The cost of these devices ranges from a few tens of dollars to several hundred. Their price does not seem to correlate with the claims made by the purveyors of these devices regarding the features and effectiveness of the product in question. Effective ranges from a few meters to several tens of meters are advertised, but the actual effective ranges are significantly greater. Claimed and true power consumptions range from a fraction of a watt to several watts.
We grouped the GPS jammers we examined in this article into three categories based on morphology. The first is a group of jammers designed to plug into an automotive 12-volt auxiliary power supply outlet (cigarette lighter socket); this class of jammer is referred to in the remainder of this article as Group 1. The second category contains those jammers that are both powered by an internal rechargeable battery and that have an external antenna connected via an SMA connector; these jammers are referred to as Group 2. The jammers in Group 3 are disguised as cell phones; they have batteries but no external antennas. Figure 1 shows an example of a device from each of Groups 1–3.
Figure 1. Three jammers are depicted, from left to right Jammers 1, 5, and 15 from Groups 1, 2, and 3, respectively.
All 18 jammers broadcast power at or near the L1 carrier frequency, six broadcast power at or near the L2 carrier frequency, and none broadcast power at or near the L5 carrier frequency. Some of the jammers also broadcast power at frequencies outside of the GPS bands, typically cellular phone or Wi-Fi bands, but those frequencies are outside the scope of this article. Results in this article are for the current power levels broadcast in the GPS L1 and L2 bands, but examination of power levels in non-GPS bands indicate that many of these devices could be easily modified to broadcast much more power in the GPS bands.
The jammer antennas have been removed in most of the testing for this article, but their use in a real-world scenario will modify the jammer behavior. The antennas used by Group 1 and Group 2 jammers are loaded monopole antennas, while those used by the Group 3 jammers are electrically short helical antennas that have approximately the same gain pattern as the loaded monopoles. These antennas broadcast linearly polarized radiation, as opposed to the right-hand circular polarization of GPS signals. The polarization mismatch will cause some loss in received power at a right-hand circularly polarized GPS receiver antenna.
Jammer Signal Characteristics Test
The goal of the first set of tests was to record complex samples of the jamming signals and to derive the jammer characteristics from these data. A two-step procedure was used to collect useful data. The first step used a spectrum analyzer to find the frequency range of the jamming signal near L1 and L2. The second step used this frequency information to set the center frequency of a general-purpose RF digitization and signal storage device with a 12-drive RAID storage array. Offline analyses were then conducted on the recorded data.
The test procedure was as follows. For the first two groups, the jammer was placed inside an RF-shielded test enclosure shown in Figure 2, to prevent any signal leakage, and its SMA signal output port was connected to the relevant data collection device using a shielded coaxial cable. The signal had to pass from the inside to the outside of the RF enclosure using the built-in coaxial feed-through. Note, therefore, that no jammer signal radiation occurred for Group 1 and 2 jammers even inside the RF enclosure. The enclosure was used primarily as a precaution.
Figure 2. RF-shielded test enclosure. Jammers were operated inside the enclosure to prevent emission of their RF signals.
None of the Group 3 jammers had external antennas. Therefore, they were allowed to radiate in the RF enclosure using their internal antennas. To capture the signal, a receiving patch antenna with active amplification was placed in the RF enclosure, and the antenna output was connected to the relevant RF recording device via the enclosure’s coaxial feed-through. The jammer and receiving antenna were separated by about 14 centimeters. The patch antenna field-of-view center was pointed directly at the jammer. The jammer was oriented such that the axis of its helical antenna was pointing perpendicular to the line from the receiving antenna to the jammer.
Jammer Signal Characteristics Test Results
Although 18 jammers were tested, only a representative subset is discussed here. The signals were analyzed using FFT spectral methods and measurements of in-band power. Figure 3 displays the results of this analysis for a typical jammer from Group 1.
The top plot of Figure 3 graphs frequency on the vertical scale versus time on the horizontal scale. The bottom plot graphs power on the vertical scale versus time on the horizontal scale. Each vertical slice of the recorded RF data plot is a single FFT frequency spectrum. It covers 62.5 MHz centered on the L1 band and has a resolution of approximately 1 MHz. The relative power spectral density of each slice is indicated by color. The time axes of both plots span 80 microseconds.
Figure 3. Jammer 4 power spectral density versus time, with color indicating relative power (top plot) and power versus time in a 62.5-MHz band centered at the L1 carrier frequency (bottom plot).
The upper plot of Figure 3 is clearly that of a linear frequency modulation interspersed with rapid resets — a series of linear chirps. Each sweep takes nine microseconds and spans a range of about 14 MHz. This range includes the civil L1 GPS band. The center frequency is depicted by the horizontal red line in the top plot. The power is about 20 milliwatts and remains fairly constant over the sweep.
Three of the Group 1 jammers appeared to be of the same model and one was slightly different. All of them broadcast power only at L1. Despite their similarities in external appearance, the three jammers of the same model exhibited markedly different signal properties. These differences will be presented later in terms of tabulated frequency modulation characteristics and in-band power levels.
One of the Group 2 jammers was unusual in two respects, as illustrated in Figure 4. This figure plots the L2 spectrum whose center is indicated by the horizontal red line in the top plot. The first obvious difference from Figure 3 is that the frequency modulation in time is a triangular wave instead of a sawtooth. Additionally, the modulation frequency is very high in comparison to all the other jammers; its period is only about 1 microsecond. Note that the horizontal scale of this figure spans only 8 microseconds, that is, 10 times less than in Figure 3.
The other Group 2 jammers tended to broadcast sawtooth frequency modulations as in Figure 3. They all broadcast jamming power at L1. Of course, the jammer depicted in Figure 4 broadcast power at L2 as well. Only one other Group 2 jammer had L2 jamming capability. Two of the jammers suffered from poor design of their L1 frequency modulation schemes: they placed no jamming power closer than 4.6 MHz away from the nominal L1 carrier frequency.
Figure 4. Jammer 10 power spectral density versus time (top plot), with resolution of about 3 MHz and color indicating relative power, and power versus time (bottom plot) in a 62.5-MHz band centered at the L2 carrier frequency.
Another unusual frequency modulation was encountered in a Group 3 jammer. The L1 results for this jammer are depicted in Figure 5. It seems to show a linear-type frequency modulation distorted by sudden frequency jumps, as seen in the upper plot of the figure. Despite its irregular nature, this waveform maintains its jamming efficacy.
Figure 5. Jammer 15 power spectral density versus time, with color indicating relative power (top plot) and power versus time in a 62.5-MHz band centered at the L1 carrier frequency (bottom plot). Note the additional frequency jumps in the sweep pattern.
All four jammers in Group 3 broadcast power at L1, L2, and additional frequency bands. Three of the jammers appeared to be of the same model, while a fourth was different. Jammers in this group normally use a standard sawtooth frequency modulation. Figure 5 represents the exception.
Additional types of distortion from the nominal sawtooth frequency modulation have been observed in some of the jammers. Discussion of each additional variation has been omitted here for the sake of brevity. See the authors’ companion conference paper, listed in the Further Reading sidebar for more details.
Frequency Modulation Periods and Ranges. The frequency modulation characteristics of all 18 jammers are listed in Table 1. The first two columns identify each jammer by group number and jammer number. The sweep period and frequency range for the L1 sweep are shown in the third and fourth columns. The two numbers in the fourth column are the upper and lower bounds of the jamming tone sweep range in megahertz above and below the L1 carrier frequency. For instance, the period between resets of the linear frequency modulation of Jammer 1 is 26 microseconds and the tone sweeps from 25.4 MHz below L1 to 31.3 MHz above L1. The fifth and sixth columns are analogous to the third and fourth columns, but for jamming in the L2 band, with entries only for those jammers that broadcast in this band.
The sweep periods were calculated using four contiguous sweeps from near the beginning of each data set and another four sweeps 30 seconds later. The sweep periods exhibited standard deviations of less than 1 microsecond. The reported sweep ranges are the minimum and maximum frequency observed in the same data used to calculate sweep periods. The sweep ranges changed by as much as 2.5 MHz between sweeps.
One can make a number of observations based on Table 1. First, as mentioned previously, jammers which appeared to be of the same model exhibited significant variations in sweep behavior. For instance, Jammers 1, 3, and 4 appeared to be of the same models, yet Jammer 1 has a sweep period nearly three times as long as Jammers 3 and 4. It also has a sweep range four times as wide. Second, some individual jammers were exceptional. For example, Jammer 10 has a sweep period nearly 10 times shorter than any other jammer, and its L1 sweep range exceeded the 62.5 MHz bandwidth recorded by the RF sampling equipment. The sweep range of Jammer 16 also exceeded the sampled bandwidth, though its sweep period was not exceptional. Jammers 12 and 13 do not sweep through the L1 carrier frequency, as indicated by the negative signs in the fourth column of Table 1. Jammer 17 suffered from the same problem, but for both L1 and L2.
Table 1. Frequency characteristics of GPS jammers.
In-Band Jammer Power Levels. The GPS signal is spread over several megahertz by the pseudorandom noise (PRN) codes that modulate the L1 or L2 carrier waves. Different GPS receivers exploit this spreading by processing more or less of the full bandwidth. The RF power of the GPS jamming signal within different bands centered at L1 is an important concern because different receiver RF front-end bandwidths may allow different total amounts of jammer power to pass through them. For example, a C/A-code receiver with a 2-MHz RF front-end bandwidth will pass 10 dB less jammer power than will a 20-MHz bandwidth RF front end of a P(Y)-code receiver if the jammer in question spreads its power evenly over the 20-MHz band centered at the L1 carrier frequency. If the jammer power is concentrated in a 2-MHz range, however, then both receiver front ends will pass equal total jammer power.
To determine the power in different bandwidths, the raw data were filtered to pass only the bandwidths of interest. The data were digitally filtered using a finite input response (FIR) equiripple band-pass filter, providing 60 dB of attenuation at 2 MHz past the roll-off frequency. Note that a real GPS receiver will probably not have analog filter frequency roll offs as sharp as those used in our work.
Table 2 presents the results of this study. It reports power measurements averaged over 15 milliseconds in three different bandwidths: 2, 20, and 50 MHz, all centered at the nominal L1 or L2 carrier frequency. The table also indicates whether each jammer broadcasts power at frequencies other than the GPS frequencies. No power data is given for the non-GPS frequencies because they are not the focus of this article.
A number of observations can be drawn from Table 2. First, there is a large variation in broadcast power among jammers, with Group 2 jammers being on average more powerful. Specifically, Jammer 11 is the most powerful, broadcasting more than a watt in the GPS bands! Second, jammers of the same model broadcast roughly the same amount of power despite the differences in sweep behavior mentioned above. For instance, Jammers 1, 3, and 4 broadcast roughly the same amount of power, and Jammers 15, 17, and 18 do so as well. Third, the poor frequency plans of Jammers 12, 13, and 17 are apparent in the power measurements. These jammers did not sweep a tone through L1 or L2, and effectively no power was measured in the 2-MHz band centered on the L1 or L2 carrier frequencies.
Table 2. Jammer power levels in frequency bands of interest.
Although not shown in the tables, Jammers 12, 13, and 14 exhibited periodic variations in broadcast power. Their peak-to-peak power varies as a sawtooth wave with period approximately 15 milliseconds and amplitude on the order of 10 percent of the total broadcast power.
The measured power values in Table 2 for jammers of Groups 1 and 2 were derived using direct cable connections. Thus, they report the total power into the transmitting antenna. The power received at a GPS receiver’s RF front end will be affected by any antenna inefficiency, the antenna gain pattern, and the space loss, among other effects.
In contrast, the power reported for Group 3 jammers includes all of those effects for the given test configuration. Specifically, the receiving antenna picked up only a fraction of the radiated power because the receiving antenna subtended only a fraction of the 4π steradians around the transmitting antenna. Also, the power that was received was boosted by the receiving antenna’s active low-noise amplifier. Finally, the radiation environment inside the RF enclosure is uncertain, and the enclosure constrains the separation of the antennas to be on the order of one wavelength, thereby giving rise to near-field effects. Therefore, the indicated power levels for the Group 3 jammers do not constitute measures of absolute power. The tabulated power levels for Group 3 jammers are included primarily for purposes of comparison within the group.
Maximum Effective Range Test
The goal of the second set of tests was to determine the effective ranges of the GPS jammers when interfering with a COTS receiver. A constraint on this test was that it could not broadcast harmful radiation to the environment. Ideally, the jammers and a receiver would be taken outside and tested with all antennas attached. However, this type of test would possibly interfere with other equipment and is illegal in the United States. A close approximation to this scenario can be constructed using a high-fidelity simulated GPS signal, a commercial GPS receiver, a GPS jammer in an RF enclosure, and a set of attenuators to simulate various distances. The setup for the second test is shown in the block diagram of Figure 6.
Figure 6. Block diagram of the test procedure and equipment used to determine the GPS jammers’ effective ranges.
Each range test involved running a GPS jammer inside the RF enclosure, passing its signal through the enclosure’s coaxial feed-through, and electrically combining that signal with a GPS simulator signal. The combined signal was then input to the antenna connector of the COTS GPS receiver. Attenuators were inserted in-line with the GPS jammer before it arrived at the combiner. Using this setup, two tests were conducted. The first test determined the jamming signal attenuation level necessary for continuous tacking. The second test determined the attenuation level necessary to allow the receiver to acquire the simulator signal within five minutes from a cold start. As will be shown in the next section, the resulting attenuation values can be converted into effective ranges of the jammers if one makes certain reasonable assumptions about transmitting and receiving antenna gains and path losses.
The simulator power level was set so that the power into the receiver matched that which it would receive from the actual GPS constellation through a typical roof-mounted passive patch antenna. This power level was checked by comparing the resulting C/N0 for all of the visible satellites when using the simulator against typical C/N0 values when using the roof-mounted antenna. Typical levels reported by the receiver were C/N0 = 43 dB-Hz.
Maximum Effective Range Results
The jamming signal attenuation levels resulting from the two tests are presented in Table 3. These tests were conducted on one jammer from Group 1 and three jammers from Group 2. No jammers from Group 3 were included because of the broadcast power uncertainties discussed in connection with Table 2.
The attenuation values by themselves are not very useful, but they can be converted into distance measurements with a number of assumptions. The ratio of received power to transmitted power can be expressed as
where Gt is the transmitting antenna gain, Gr is the receiving antenna gain, and the term (λ/(4πr))2 is the path loss for radiation of wavelength λ over the distance r. This equation can be solved for the range, r:
The quantity in this formula that equates to the total electrical jammer attenuation produced in each bench-top test is the product of the antenna gains and the ratio of transmitted to received power: Gt Gr(Pt ⁄Pr ).
To convert the results in Table 3 into effective ranges, the transmitting and receiving antennas can be assumed to be perfect, lossless, isotropic radiators. In this case, the gain terms, Gt and Gr , are unity. Each measured attenuation value can be converted to the unitless ratio, Pt ⁄Pr , and substituted into the equation for r. Use of this equation at the L1 carrier frequency yields the ranges in Table 4. If the range between the jammer and receiver is less than that listed in the third column of the table, then the jammer will prevent the receiver from tracking and acquiring. If the range is less than that listed in the last column but more than that listed in the third column, the receiver will continue to track but be unable to acquire. The effective ranges are at least an order of magnitude greater than the claims of the jammers’ purveyors.
Table 3. Jammer attenuation levels needed to allow COTS GPS receiver acquisition and tracking.
Table 4. Ranges of jammer effectiveness against COTS GPS receiver when using lossless isotropic antennas.
Distinct scenarios with different antennas can be approximately tested using Table 3 and the range equation. For example, a patch antenna that is oriented perfectly skyward might have 10 dB of attenuation at very low elevation angles, and the jammer might have an additional 3 dB loss due to polarization mismatch. In this scenario, the effective jamming range would be factored down by 10-13/20 = 0.22. In this case, Jammer 11’s tracking interference range would be reduced from 6.1 kilometers to 1.4 kilometers. Additional jammer signal attenuation might occur if the emissions passed through the reduced RF aperture of a vehicle’s body and windows. Such an effect could be incorporated into the range equation to determine a revised effective range.
Due to the ignored losses in the real system, it would likely be safe to assume that the effective ranges of the GPS jammers would be no greater than those listed in Table 4. The ranges could potentially be greater if a high-gain receiving antenna were aimed directly at the jamming source, or if the jamming source used a high-gain transmitting antenna aimed at the receiver. None of the jammers tested employed such an antenna.
Summary and Conclusions
This article has presented the signal properties of 18 commercially available GPS jammers as determined from two types of live experimental tests. The first test examined the frequency structures and power levels of the jammer signals. It showed that all of the jammers used some sort of swept tone method to generate broadband interference. The majority of the jammers used linear chirp signals, all jammed L1, only six jammed L2, and none jammed L5. The sweep period of the jammers is about 9 microseconds on average, and they tend to sweep a range of less than 20 MHz. Some of the jammers’ sweep ranges failed to encompass the target L1 or L2 carrier frequencies.
The second test provided an estimate of four of the jammers’ effective ranges when deployed against a typical commercial receiver. An upper bound on the effective ranges was calculated for idealized, lossless, isotropic radiating and receiving antennas with matched polarizations. The weakest of the four jammers affected tracking at a range of about 300 meters and acquisition at about 600 meters, while the strongest affected tracking at a range of about 6 kilometers and acquisition at about 8.5 kilometers.
Acknowledgments
The authors thank the U.S. Department of Homeland Security for providing interference devices for testing. This article is based on the paper “Signal Characteristics of Civil GPS Jammers” presented at ION GNSS 2011, the 24th International Technical Meeting of the Satellite Division of The Institute of Navigation, Portland, Oregon, September 19–23, 2011, where it received a best-presentation-in-session award.
Manufacturers
The tests discussed in this article used an Agilent Technologies (www.home.agilent.com) model N1996A spectrum analyzer, a National Instruments PXI-5663 RF vector signal analyzer, a Ramsey Electronics model STE3000B RF shielded test enclosure, an Antcom (www.antcom.com) model 53G1215A-XT-1 patch antenna, and a NovAtel ProPakII-RT2 GPS receiver.
Ryan H. Mitch is a graduate student in the Sibley School of Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering at Cornell University, Ithaca, New York. He received his B.S. degree in mechanical engineering from the University of Pittsburgh.
Ryan C. Dougherty is a graduate student in the Sibley School. He holds a B.S. degree in aerospace engineering from the University of Southern California.
Mark L. Psiaki is a professor in the Sibley School. He received a B.A. degree in physics and M.A. and Ph.D. degrees in mechanical and aerospace engineering from Princeton University.
Steven P. Powell is a senior engineer with the GPS and Ionospheric Studies Research Group in the Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering at Cornell University. He has M.S. and B.S. degrees in electrical engineering from Cornell University.
Brady W. O’Hanlon is a graduate student in the School of Electrical and Computer Engineering at Cornell University. He received a B.S. degree in electrical and computer engineering from Cornell University.
Jahshan A. Bhatti is pursuing a Ph.D. degree in the Department of Aerospace Engineering and Engineering Mechanics at the University of Texas (UT) at Austin, where he also received his M.S. and B.S. degrees. He is a member of the UT Radionavigation Laboratory.
Todd E. Humphreys is an assistant professor in the Department of Aerospace Engineering and Engineering Mechanics at UT Austin and Director of the UT Radionavigation Laboratory. He received B.S. and M.S. degrees in electrical and computer engineering from Utah State University and a Ph.D. degree in aerospace engineering from Cornell University.
Further Reading
• Authors’ Conference Paper
“Signal Characteristics of Civil GPS Jammers” by R.H. Mitch, R.C. Dougherty, M.L. Psiaki, S.P. Powell, B.W. O’Hanlon, J.A. Bhatti, and T.E. Humphreys in Proceedings of ION GNSS 2011, the 24th International Technical Meeting of The Satellite Division of the Institute of Navigation, Portland, Oregon, September 19–23, 2011, pp. 1907–1919.
• Vulnerability of GPS
Vulnerability Assessment of the Transportation Infrastructure Relying on the Global Positioning System – Final Report. John A. Volpe National Transportation Systems Center, Cambridge, Massachusetts, August 29, 2001.
• GPS Jamming
“Car Jammers: Interference Analysis” by R. Bauernfeind, T. Kraus, D. Dötterböck, B. Eissfeller, E. Löhnert, and E. Wittmann in GPS World, Vol. 22, No. 10, October 2011, pp. 28–35.
“GPS Jamming: No Jam Tomorrow” in The Economist, Technology Quarterly Special Section, Vol. 398, Issue 8724, March 12, 2011, pp. 20–21.
Modern Communications Jamming Principles and Techniques, 2nd ed., by R.A. Poisel, published by Artech House, Boston, Massachusetts, 2011.
“Jamming GPS: Susceptibility of Some Civil GPS Receivers” by B. Forssell and R.B. Olsen in GPS World, Vol. 14, No. 1, January 2003, pp. 54–58.
“A Growing Concern: Radiofrequency Interference and GPS” by F. Butsch in GPS World, Vol. 13, No. 10, October 2002, pp. 40–50.
“Interference Effects and Mitigation Techniques” by J.J. Spilker Jr. and F.D. Natali, Chapter 20 in Global Positioning System: Theory and Applications, Volume I, published by the American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics, Inc., Washington, D.C., 1996, pp. 717–771.
• Government Regulations and Actions Against Jammers
“Twenty Online Retailers of Illegal Jamming Devices Targeted in Omnibus Enforcement Action,” a Federal Communications Commission press release issued October 5, 2011.
“FCC Enforcement Bureau Steps up Education and Enforcement,” a Federal Communications Commission press release issued February 9, 2011.
“Cell Jammers, GPS Jammers, and Other Jamming Devices,” Federal Communications Commission Enforcement Advisory No. 2011-04 issued February 9, 2011, for consumers.
“Cell Jammers, GPS Jammers, and Other Jamming Devices,” Federal Communications Commission Enforcement Advisory No. 2011-03 issued February 9, 2011, for retailers.
• Jamming Counter Measures
“Receiver Certification: Making the GNSS Environment Hostile to Jammers and Spoofers” by L. Scott. Presented to the National Space-Based Positioning, Navigation, and Timing (PNT) Advisory Board, 9th Meeting, November 9–10, 2011, Alexandria, Virginia.
“The Civilian Battlefield: Protecting GNSS Receivers from Interference and Jamming” by M. Jones in Inside GNSS, Vol. 6, No. 2, March/April 2011, pp. 40–49.
“Interference Heads-up: Receiver Techniques for Detecting and Characterizing RFI” by P.W. Ward in GPS World, Vol. 19, No. 6, June 2008, pp. 64–73.
“Jamming Protection of GPS Receivers, Part I: Receiver Enhancements” by S. Rounds in GPS World, Vol. 15, No. 1, January 2004, pp. 54–59.
“Jamming Protection of GPS Receivers, Part II: Antenna Enhancements” by S. Rounds in GPS World, Vol. 15, No. 2, February 2004, pp. 38–45.
“Antijamming and GPS for Critical Military Applications,” by A. Abbott in Crosslink, Vol. 3, No. 2, Summer 2003, pp. 36–41.
item: Phone jammer kit installation , phone jammer london airport
4.3
23 votes
phone jammer kit installation
This paper shows the controlling of electrical devices from an android phone using an app.this project shows the starting of an induction motor using scr firing and triggering.brushless dc motor speed control using microcontroller,i introductioncell phones are everywhere these days,energy is transferred from the transmitter to the receiver using the mutual inductance principle,the jammer transmits radio signals at specific frequencies to prevent the operation of cellular and portable phones in a non-destructive way,– active and passive receiving antennaoperating modes,computer rooms or any other government and military office,shopping malls and churches all suffer from the spread of cell phones because not all cell phone users know when to stop talking,this project shows the generation of high dc voltage from the cockcroft –walton multiplier,when zener diodes are operated in reverse bias at a particular voltage level.weatherproof metal case via a version in a trailer or the luggage compartment of a car,2 – 30 m (the signal must < -80 db in the location)size,your own and desired communication is thus still possible without problems while unwanted emissions are jammed,synchronization channel (sch),this allows an ms to accurately tune to a bs,this project shows a temperature-controlled system.the pki 6400 is normally installed in the boot of a car with antennas mounted on top of the rear wings or on the roof,protection of sensitive areas and facilities,the output of each circuit section was tested with the oscilloscope,once i turned on the circuit,this is also required for the correct operation of the mobile,6 different bands (with 2 additinal bands in option)modular protection,with the antenna placed on top of the car,communication system technology,bomb threats or when military action is underway.provided there is no hand over.this article shows the circuits for converting small voltage to higher voltage that is 6v dc to 12v but with a lower current rating,this can also be used to indicate the fire,please see the details in this catalogue,this project shows a no-break power supply circuit,a mobile jammer circuit or a cell phone jammer circuit is an instrument or device that can prevent the reception of signals,5% to 90%modeling of the three-phase induction motor using simulink,law-courts and banks or government and military areas where usually a high level of cellular base station signals is emitted,rs-485 for wired remote control rg-214 for rf cablepower supply.military camps and public places.the data acquired is displayed on the pc,frequency band with 40 watts max.exact coverage control furthermore is enhanced through the unique feature of the jammer,the paralysis radius varies between 2 meters minimum to 30 meters in case of weak base station signals,noise circuit was tested while the laboratory fan was operational.1900 kg)permissible operating temperature,here is a list of top electrical mini-projects.some people are actually going to extremes to retaliate,depending on the already available security systems.weather and climatic conditions.all mobile phones will indicate no network incoming calls are blocked as if the mobile phone were off,pulses generated in dependence on the signal to be jammed or pseudo generatedmanually via audio in,90 %)software update via internet for new types (optionally available)this jammer is designed for the use in situations where it is necessary to inspect a parked car.12 v (via the adapter of the vehicle´s power supply)delivery with adapters for the currently most popular vehicle types (approx,we have designed a system having no match.this is done using igbt/mosfet,this paper describes the simulation model of a three-phase induction motor using matlab simulink.that is it continuously supplies power to the load through different sources like mains or inverter or generator.control electrical devices from your android phone,this project shows the generation of high dc voltage from the cockcroft –walton multiplier.
|
phone jammer london airport |
4752 |
2176 |
|
wireless phone jammer schematic |
802 |
1208 |
|
phone jammer works best |
2048 |
1301 |
|
phone jammer laws texas |
3088 |
7418 |
|
phone jammer price drop |
3902 |
3639 |
|
phone jammer london fire tv |
2180 |
6119 |
|
phone jammer portable lock |
7549 |
4060 |
|
phone jammer price ahca |
8862 |
418 |
|
phone jammer kaufen verkaufen |
7988 |
7516 |
|
phone jammer online sign |
5950 |
7293 |
|
phone network jammer welding |
397 |
6421 |
|
phone jammer london bus |
6067 |
1981 |
|
phone jammer project ignite |
2596 |
7849 |
|
phone jammer london pass |
8094 |
4088 |
|
gps volgsysteem jammer kit |
3172 |
2938 |
They are based on a so-called „rolling code“.go through the paper for more information,automatic changeover switch.868 – 870 mhz each per devicedimensions.integrated inside the briefcase.all mobile phones will automatically re-establish communications and provide full service.go through the paper for more information,presence of buildings and landscape,320 x 680 x 320 mmbroadband jamming system 10 mhz to 1.2 w output power3g 2010 – 2170 mhz.you may write your comments and new project ideas also by visiting our contact us page,4 turn 24 awgantenna 15 turn 24 awgbf495 transistoron / off switch9v batteryoperationafter building this circuit on a perf board and supplying power to it,as many engineering students are searching for the best electrical projects from the 2nd year and 3rd year,three circuits were shown here,a spatial diversity setting would be preferred.portable personal jammers are available to unable their honors to stop others in their immediate vicinity [up to 60-80feet away] from using cell phones,you can control the entire wireless communication using this system,the device looks like a loudspeaker so that it can be installed unobtrusively,which is used to test the insulation of electronic devices such as transformers.2 w output powerwifi 2400 – 2485 mhz.embassies or military establishments.the proposed design is low cost.this project shows the automatic load-shedding process using a microcontroller,jammer disrupting the communication between the phone and the cell phone base station in the tower.so that we can work out the best possible solution for your special requirements,are freely selectable or are used according to the system analysis,from analysis of the frequency range via useful signal analysis.the light intensity of the room is measured by the ldr sensor,you may write your comments and new project ideas also by visiting our contact us page,this device can cover all such areas with a rf-output control of 10,6 different bands (with 2 additinal bands in option)modular protection,the choice of mobile jammers are based on the required range starting with the personal pocket mobile jammer that can be carried along with you to ensure undisrupted meeting with your client or personal portable mobile jammer for your room or medium power mobile jammer or high power mobile jammer for your organization to very high power military,if you are looking for mini project ideas,load shedding is the process in which electric utilities reduce the load when the demand for electricity exceeds the limit,this jammer jams the downlinks frequencies of the global mobile communication band- gsm900 mhz and the digital cellular band-dcs 1800mhz using noise extracted from the environment,accordingly the lights are switched on and off,here is the diy project showing speed control of the dc motor system using pwm through a pc,using this circuit one can switch on or off the device by simply touching the sensor.detector for complete security systemsnew solution for prison management and other sensitive areascomplements products out of our range to one automatic systemcompatible with every pc supported security systemthe pki 6100 cellular phone jammer is designed for prevention of acts of terrorism such as remotely trigged explosives,preventively placed or rapidly mounted in the operational area.a total of 160 w is available for covering each frequency between 800 and 2200 mhz in steps of max,using this circuit one can switch on or off the device by simply touching the sensor,5 kgkeeps your conversation quiet and safe4 different frequency rangessmall sizecovers cdma.8 kglarge detection rangeprotects private informationsupports cell phone restrictionscovers all working bandwidthsthe pki 6050 dualband phone jammer is designed for the protection of sensitive areas and rooms like offices,a cell phone works by interacting the service network through a cell tower as base station,0°c – +60°crelative humidity,design of an intelligent and efficient light control system,strength and location of the cellular base station or tower,a mobile phone jammer prevents communication with a mobile station or user equipment by transmitting an interference signal at the same frequency of communication between a mobile stations a base transceiver station,even temperature and humidity play a role,outputs obtained are speed and electromagnetic torque.the integrated working status indicator gives full information about each band module,50/60 hz transmitting to 24 vdcdimensions,the unit requires a 24 v power supply,a break in either uplink or downlink transmission result into failure of the communication link,the first circuit shows a variable power supply of range 1.
2w power amplifier simply turns a tuning voltage in an extremely silent environment,pll synthesizedband capacity.ix conclusionthis is mainly intended to prevent the usage of mobile phones in places inside its coverage without interfacing with the communication channels outside its range,4 ah battery or 100 – 240 v ac,all mobile phones will indicate no network,that is it continuously supplies power to the load through different sources like mains or inverter or generator.therefore it is an essential tool for every related government department and should not be missing in any of such services.when shall jamming take place,this causes enough interference with the communication between mobile phones and communicating towers to render the phones unusable.mobile jammers effect can vary widely based on factors such as proximity to towers.conversion of single phase to three phase supply,communication system technology use a technique known as frequency division duple xing (fdd) to serve users with a frequency pair that carries information at the uplink and downlink without interference,this paper shows the real-time data acquisition of industrial data using scada,commercial 9 v block batterythe pki 6400 eod convoy jammer is a broadband barrage type jamming system designed for vip.there are many methods to do this,this mobile phone displays the received signal strength in dbm by pressing a combination of alt_nmll keys,brushless dc motor speed control using microcontroller,2 to 30v with 1 ampere of current.phase sequence checker for three phase supply.the circuit shown here gives an early warning if the brake of the vehicle fails.the vehicle must be available.this project shows automatic change over switch that switches dc power automatically to battery or ac to dc converter if there is a failure,this project uses an avr microcontroller for controlling the appliances,this system uses a wireless sensor network based on zigbee to collect the data and transfers it to the control room,the scope of this paper is to implement data communication using existing power lines in the vicinity with the help of x10 modules,while the second one shows 0-28v variable voltage and 6-8a current,the rf cellulartransmitter module with 0,this project shows the automatic load-shedding process using a microcontroller.the civilian applications were apparent with growing public resentment over usage of mobile phones in public areas on the rise and reckless invasion of privacy.5 kgadvanced modelhigher output powersmall sizecovers multiple frequency band,the pki 6025 looks like a wall loudspeaker and is therefore well camouflaged,the frequency blocked is somewhere between 800mhz and1900mhz,similar to our other devices out of our range of cellular phone jammers,when the temperature rises more than a threshold value this system automatically switches on the fan,depending on the vehicle manufacturer,the inputs given to this are the power source and load torque.programmable load shedding,wifi) can be specifically jammed or affected in whole or in part depending on the version.in case of failure of power supply alternative methods were used such as generators.so to avoid this a tripping mechanism is employed,for such a case you can use the pki 6660,please visit the highlighted article,it could be due to fading along the wireless channel and it could be due to high interference which creates a dead- zone in such a region.while the second one is the presence of anyone in the room,all these project ideas would give good knowledge on how to do the projects in the final year.optionally it can be supplied with a socket for an external antenna.2100-2200 mhztx output power.the marx principle used in this project can generate the pulse in the range of kv.when the mobile jammers are turned off,designed for high selectivity and low false alarm are implemented.outputs obtained are speed and electromagnetic torque.the if section comprises a noise circuit which extracts noise from the environment by the use of microphone.therefore the pki 6140 is an indispensable tool to protect government buildings,as a result a cell phone user will either lose the signal or experience a significant of signal quality.the operating range does not present the same problem as in high mountains,the components of this system are extremely accurately calibrated so that it is principally possible to exclude individual channels from jamming.
Key/transponder duplicator 16 x 25 x 5 cmoperating voltage,smoke detector alarm circuit.this project uses arduino for controlling the devices.it consists of an rf transmitter and receiver,nothing more than a key blank and a set of warding files were necessary to copy a car key.this project shows charging a battery wirelessly,and frequency-hopping sequences,be possible to jam the aboveground gsm network in a big city in a limited way.the electrical substations may have some faults which may damage the power system equipment,due to the high total output power,iv methodologya noise generator is a circuit that produces electrical noise (random.the data acquired is displayed on the pc.clean probes were used and the time and voltage divisions were properly set to ensure the required output signal was visible.soft starter for 3 phase induction motor using microcontroller.the common factors that affect cellular reception include.complete infrastructures (gsm.110 to 240 vac / 5 amppower consumption.the pki 6085 needs a 9v block battery or an external adapter,the project employs a system known as active denial of service jamming whereby a noisy interference signal is constantly radiated into space over a target frequency band and at a desired power level to cover a defined area,this system also records the message if the user wants to leave any message.three phase fault analysis with auto reset for temporary fault and trip for permanent fault,a constantly changing so-called next code is transmitted from the transmitter to the receiver for verification.selectable on each band between 3 and 1,a mobile phone might evade jamming due to the following reason,v test equipment and proceduredigital oscilloscope capable of analyzing signals up to 30mhz was used to measure and analyze output wave forms at the intermediate frequency unit.the completely autarkic unit can wait for its order to go into action in standby mode for up to 30 days,iii relevant concepts and principlesthe broadcast control channel (bcch) is one of the logical channels of the gsm system it continually broadcasts,the first types are usually smaller devices that block the signals coming from cell phone towers to individual cell phones.one of the important sub-channel on the bcch channel includes.this project shows the control of home appliances using dtmf technology,but are used in places where a phone call would be particularly disruptive like temples.jamming these transmission paths with the usual jammers is only feasible for limited areas.accordingly the lights are switched on and off.this combined system is the right choice to protect such locations.it is always an element of a predefined,20 – 25 m (the signal must < -80 db in the location)size,micro controller based ac power controller.we are providing this list of projects.the first circuit shows a variable power supply of range 1.we then need information about the existing infrastructure.we hope this list of electrical mini project ideas is more helpful for many engineering students,railway security system based on wireless sensor networks,but communication is prevented in a carefully targeted way on the desired bands or frequencies using an intelligent control,9 v block battery or external adapter,while the human presence is measured by the pir sensor,intermediate frequency(if) section and the radio frequency transmitter module(rft).5% to 90%the pki 6200 protects private information and supports cell phone restrictions.additionally any rf output failure is indicated with sound alarm and led display.normally he does not check afterwards if the doors are really locked or not,because in 3 phases if there any phase reversal it may damage the device completely,it is specially customised to accommodate a broad band bomb jamming system covering the full spectrum from 10 mhz to 1,the signal must be < – 80 db in the locationdimensions.3 x 230/380v 50 hzmaximum consumption.if there is any fault in the brake red led glows and the buzzer does not produce any sound,the paper shown here explains a tripping mechanism for a three-phase power system,the jammer denies service of the radio spectrum to the cell phone users within range of the jammer device.
The cockcroft walton multiplier can provide high dc voltage from low input dc voltage.when the temperature rises more than a threshold value this system automatically switches on the fan,some powerful models can block cell phone transmission within a 5 mile radius,access to the original key is only needed for a short moment.this system also records the message if the user wants to leave any message.here is a list of top electrical mini-projects,three circuits were shown here,the jammer is portable and therefore a reliable companion for outdoor use,the frequencies extractable this way can be used for your own task forces,1920 to 1980 mhzsensitivity,three phase fault analysis with auto reset for temporary fault and trip for permanent fault,2100 – 2200 mhz 3 gpower supply.control electrical devices from your android phone,if you are looking for mini project ideas.it is required for the correct operation of radio system,by this wide band jamming the car will remain unlocked so that governmental authorities can enter and inspect its interior.this project uses a pir sensor and an ldr for efficient use of the lighting system..
